Innovative GUI design for integrated electric vessel control
This embedded GUI design gives operators direct control of the vessel drive in every situation, from rapid movement on open water to precise adjustments during harbour manoeuvres. It also clarifies the ship energy management system, bringing propulsion, generators, batteries, and auxiliary loads into a single embedded user interface that feels dependable under pressure.
This project is part of our continued work in embedded HMI and maritime systems, where evidence based UX, real time constraints and interaction architecture shape control interfaces for demanding operational conditions.
Built on seven years of embedded systems design and developed by our UX design agency for maritime conditions, the interface behaves predictably even when the vessel accelerates or visibility drops. Captains see a coherent picture of propulsion and energy rather than fragments scattered across screens. This strengthened Torqeedo position in the market and contributed to the company acquisition by Yamaha.
We applied Dynamic Systems Design, a method that grows solutions through embedded experimentation, resolves tensions between local optimization and system coherence, and stewards implementation until organizations gain independence.
I NOSTRI CONTRIBUTI
Maritime Field Research
Domain Learning
Option Space Mapping
Interaction Architecture
Sea Trial Validation
UI Design - Day/Dusk/Night
Sistema di progettazione
Implementation Partnership
UNDERSTANDING THE LIMITS OF THE INHERITED LEGACY
The previous embedded user interface held years of practical insight, yet it no longer matched the complexity of modern hybrid vessels. Propulsion status appeared on one screen, battery state on another, and generator information on a third, which forced captains to step through multiple views to understand power availability during manoeuvres. In bright daylight, low contrast icons made critical details hard to read on the embedded display.
In our research this legacy system became a valuable source of evidence. Its structure revealed how captains had learned to compensate for scattered information and where this compensation created stress and hesitation. Analysing these patterns through constraint respecting allowed us to decide what deserved preservation and what required restructuring. The new control system interface therefore respects the experience encoded in the old design while resolving the structural limits that held the vessel back.
STRUCTURE THAT UNIFIES THE ENTIRE SYSTEM
The vessel relies on many interconnected routines, and the embedded interface now brings them into a single structural logic that remains stable across twenty seven screens, grouped into four primary operational modes. Hybrid drive balance, propulsion demand, and auxiliary behaviour each update at different intervals, yet the interaction design keeps them aligned so captains can understand system behaviour with one glance rather than several.
This structural clarity matters on vessels ranging from smaller craft of about six metres to commercial ships over fifty five metres, where maritime interfaces must support fast recognition rather than slow interpretation. The same organising principle appears in every context, which means that once crews learn the pattern on one vessel, they can transfer that knowledge to other configurations. A disciplined design system makes this possible while still allowing for variation in vessel hardware and layout.
The structure had to be validated by several stakeholder groups to ensure alignment with engineering, product, and operational requirements.
EXACT VISUAL RESPONSE IN EVERY CONDITION
At this level, the embedded user interface has to express each system state with exact clarity. The propulsion indicator moves through three meaningful states of idle, cruise, and full output, while the hybrid drive shows its charge and discharge cycles with transition timing that feels responsive without becoming restless. Battery contribution, generator output, and auxiliary load behaviour update at their own cadences, and the display operates within strict limits for resolution and refresh.
These constraints guide line weight, spacing, and the pacing of state changes. The goal is for captains to register a change on the first glance, without needing to watch the screen for several seconds. During sea trials this precision meant that manoeuvres which previously required repeated checks could be executed with fewer glances, even when the vessel was subject to vibration, sharp movement, or low visibility.
A CLEAR VISUAL VOCABULARY FOR OPERATORS
The icons and interface elements form a visual vocabulary that mirrors how captains actually work in daily operations. Propulsion symbols express the state of each motor, battery indicators show the rhythm of energy flow, and mode cues shift cleanly as crews move between navigation, manoeuvring, and mooring. The same graphical conventions appear in every operational mode, which reduces the mental effort required to interpret them.
Each element must remain legible on a ten inch embedded display with limited pixel density, in conditions that include glare, rain, and gloved interaction. The UI therefore follows strict rules for contrast, minimum touch target dimensions, and typography suitable for sunlight readability. These refinements are grounded in testing rather than aesthetic preference. Routine checks become moments of clarity instead of strain, including when operators scan the touchscreen at night or in rough water.
THE ORGANISING PRINCIPLE BEHIND THE INTERFACE
Behind the screens lies a structural model that explains the behaviour of the entire hybrid vessel. It connects propulsion demand, generator output, battery reserves from roughly forty to two hundred kilowatt hours, conversion units, and auxiliary loads into one readable pattern. This model reconciles the different rhythms within the ship so that fast propulsion updates sit meaningfully alongside slower energy cycles.
Professional captains rely on a single mental map when they judge the state of a vessel. The HMI design provides that map in visual form. It keeps related values in stable positions, aligns scales across screens, and ensures that changes in one subsystem are mirrored by appropriate cues in others. This structural clarity is what allows the embedded GUI to scale from simpler vessels to complex multi generator configurations without altering the underlying logic.
EVIDENCE BASED UX/UI DESIGN IS ROOTED IN REALITY
Much of the design work depended on evidence gathered directly on the water through user research and collaborative sessions with captains. Through Sandbox Experiments, across twelve sea trials over six months, with fifteen professional captains, we observed how vibration affects readability, how hybrid energy balance shifts during acceleration, and how glare from cold water reduces contrast on embedded displays.
Testing in temperatures from minus five to thirty five degrees and during night operations between late evening and early morning revealed scanning patterns that only appear in real maritime work. These insights guided concrete decisions about contrast rules, interaction timing, alarm visibility, and screen hierarchy. They also revealed the emotional dimension of control system interfaces, especially the relief crews feel when information remains stable even as the vessel behaves unpredictably.
DESIGNING FOR THE SCALE OF LARGE HYBRID VESSELS
Supporting Torqeedo expansion into larger hybrid vessels required more than refining the existing UI. It meant creating a maritime interface that communicates the behaviour of ships with much greater technical depth. These vessels can measure over fifty five metres and may include several diesel generators, dual battery banks within the forty to two hundred kilowatt hour range, conversion units managing significant power, and complex cooling and distribution circuits.
Professional captains need an embedded user interface that reflects these interactions rather than isolating readings on separate screens. The blueprint of the vessel, with its propulsion motors, central control centre, power balancing system, and auxiliary loads, therefore became a reference structure for the HMI. Grounding the interaction design in this architecture ensured that what captains see on the display corresponds directly to how the vessel behaves in practice.
Working with several internal and external stakeholders required aligning vessel logic, engineering constraints, and interface behaviour across teams.
MAPPING THE FULL RANGE OF UX POSSIBILITIES
Before converging on a final interaction architecture, we opened a divergent exploration phase through lateral exploration to map the full range of UX possibilities. The team identified key challenges that shape everyday use, such as how to present propulsion state, how to show hybrid energy flow, and how to support navigation and mooring as a continuous experience rather than separate modes.
For each challenge we created and tested multiple interface concepts through option space mapping. Some emphasised propulsion status above all else, others foregrounded energy flow, and some attempted to merge both perspectives into a single view. Using real data rhythms during testing revealed where promising ideas collapsed under vibration or produced hesitation at critical moments. Concepts that required too many transitions or slowed down night manoeuvres were discarded. What remained was a coherent design system with twenty seven screens across four operational modes.
ABBIAMO SEMPLIFICATO I CONCETTI ASTRATTI PER TUTTI
The construction logic behind this embedded user interface is grounded in a grid that synchronises the many rhythms of a hybrid vessel. Propulsion sensors update rapidly, batteries follow slower cycles, and generators respond to changing load. The grid merges these signals into a unified cadence on the embedded display so that captains perceive the system as one organism rather than a set of disconnected parts.
All of this operates within the technical constraints already established for resolution, refresh cycle, contrast, touch targets, and typography. These parameters inform spacing, alignment, and the visual hierarchy of information and alerts. The result is an embedded GUI that allows captains to judge energy balance and propulsion readiness almost instantly, including in vibration, sharp movement, or changing light. Abstract concepts such as hybrid energy flow become concrete without hiding the underlying complexity.
A CLEARER FOUNDATION FOR MARITIME DECISION MAKING
The redesigned embedded user interface has a measurable impact on how captains manage hybrid vessels during real operations. With twenty seven screens organised into four modes, the design system lets crews move through navigation, manoeuvring, and mooring while maintaining a continuous sense of energy availability and propulsion response.
In comparative trials, captains identified key energy states significantly faster than with the legacy UI, and tasks that once required multiple transitions can now be confirmed with a single glance. This improvement grew from maritime field research, collaborative design, and focused testing that addressed both cognitive load and emotional strain. The interface becomes not only a control surface but also a steady presence that supports confident decisions when conditions are uncertain.
IL DESIGN UX/UI RENDE UN PRODOTTO LEADER
The final system brings the behaviour of advanced hybrid vessels into a unified embedded GUI that scales from smaller craft to commercial ships. Propulsion demand, generator output, battery reserves, and auxiliary loads are expressed through a coherent design system shaped by real maritime practice and real time interface constraints.
The interface remains dependable when the vessel accelerates, shifts energy sources, or moves through low visibility conditions. It gives Torqeedo a stable foundation for future hardware modules and new hybrid architectures, while giving crews a system that feels composed and trustworthy in daily use.
The organization gained intangible resources: judgment about what matters in hybrid vessel control, shared product intuition about how maritime systems should behave under pressure, and reasoning capability that allows teams to extend the interface across new vessel configurations. The system maintains competitive position by delivering reliable, predictable control in demanding maritime conditions, while competitors who prioritize feature density over operational clarity struggle to serve professional captains working in real sea states with safety critical responsibilities.
In this way, UX and UI design do not sit on top of the technology but become part of how the product earns its place as a leading solution in its field.